January 09, 2006

What's in a Name?

by Armen

I really hope this is not true. It's the first time I've seen it reported anywhere. But if indeed you can't "annoy" someone online anonymously, then I would like to see charges brought against a blogger named Publius. [Note: If there is actually any such blogger, I have nothing against him/her, I just want the irony.]

UPDATE: As commenter Tom T. points out, Prof. Volokh has his thoughts here and here, while Prof. Kerr has his initial thoughts here. Neither of them, however, posts under a pseudonym, but I have mentioned how Volokh annoys me with his sales pitches for Academic Legal Writing.

January 9, 2006 09:59 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Oh, is there a blogger named Publius...

Posted by: PG at January 10, 2006 01:25 AM

I don't think Declan McCullagh is interpreting the law correctly: http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/archives/002638.html

Posted by: Ann Bartow at January 10, 2006 08:18 AM

They're arguing about this one over at Volokh.

Posted by: Tom T. at January 10, 2006 07:45 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Sitting in Review
Armen (e-mail) #
PG (e-mail) #
Dave (e-mail) #
Craig (e-mail) #
About Us
Senior Status
Chris Geidner #
Jeremy Blachman #
Nick Morgan #
Wings & Vodka #
Recent Opinions
Symposia
Persuasive Authority
De Novo Reporter
Research


Powered by
Movable Type 3.21