August 23, 2006

Thomas, J., Sitting by Designation

by Armen

In May I posted about the possibility of role-playing a current SCOTUS justice in a seminar that looks at current cases pending before the Court. Well, yesterday I and my co-justice were selected to be Justice Thomas for the remainder of the year. I know that Thomas actually asked questions during a cross-burning case, but are there any other cases where he's spoken during oral arguments? Also, does anyone have a copy of a 1793 English Dictionary?

August 23, 2006 02:40 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Yes, there are others. See my incomplete survey here and in the attached comments: http://www.crescatsententia.net/archives/2004/11/14/#004693

Posted by: Will Baude at August 23, 2006 10:40 AM

Armen,
Are you into originalism in your search for a 1793 dictionary? For example, what were the definitions of "intercourse among the states" and "commerce" at the times of the adoption/ratification of the Constitution?

Also, I would suggest that when you sit as Justice Thomas you have a can of Pepsi and not Coca Cola - and by all means use a straw!

Posted by: Shag from Brookline at August 24, 2006 06:53 AM

Am I into originalism? Is that a joke or something? The hell with Leiter's criticism of originalism...it makes for the shortest opinions.

I will stock up on Pepsis and straws immediately. Appreciate the tip. Do I have any other quirks?

-- CT

Posted by: Armen at August 24, 2006 11:41 AM

Lean back in your chair, show life only when someone hands you something to read, and you'll cover all I know about Thomas in oral argument. I will say that I'm finding a greater affection for Thomas's opinions; I think he's better at getting to the point without a lot of entertaining but rather juvenile and unprofessional extras. In particular, his Lawrence dissent contrasts favorably with Scalia's. Thomas simply said he wouldn't keep the law as a legislator but cannot void it as a judge, whereas Scalia felt the need to go on at length about the slippery slope to incest and bestiality.

Posted by: PG at August 25, 2006 03:58 AM

As a matter of good blogging form, you may wish to link to this entry whenever you write a post as CT. Readers who see your later posts may get confused when reading about Armen's "fellow justices," especially if they did read this the first time.

Posted by: A. Rickey at August 28, 2006 07:30 AM

Yeah I was thinking about that...but I was just too lazy.

Posted by: Armen at August 28, 2006 02:49 PM

Georgia v. Randolph, last term

Posted by: anon at September 27, 2006 08:51 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Sitting in Review
Armen (e-mail) #
PG (e-mail) #
Dave (e-mail) #
Craig (e-mail) #
About Us
Senior Status
Chris Geidner #
Jeremy Blachman #
Nick Morgan #
Wings & Vodka #
Recent Opinions
Symposia
Persuasive Authority
De Novo Reporter
Research


Powered by
Movable Type 3.21